Evaluation Criteria

Abstract evaluation criteria:

Abstracts are evaluated by experts on a five-point scale (1 – minimum score, 5 –

maximum) for the following indicators:

1. Originality of research (1-5)
2. Validity and consistency of work (1-5)
3. Quality and presentability of results (1-5)
4. Relevance (1-5)

The final score is made up of the sum of the indicators mentioned above and ranges from 4 to 20 points.

Criteria for evaluating an oral presentation:

1. Assessment of the quality of scientific work: scientific novelty, practical significance, research design, personal contribution of the author.
2. Evaluation of the presentation: consistency, brevity and clarity of the report, compliance with the time limit.
3. Evaluation of the discussion: the correctness of the understanding of the question, the adequacy and consistency of the speaker's answers.